skip to main |
skip to sidebar
By Nicholas Stix
Last night, VDARE editor-publisher Peter Brimelow published my second investigative report on the racist atrocity I have dubbed the Pearcy Massacre: “‘Don’t Raise Your Voice at Me!’ [Click!] ‘Read a Law Book!’ [Click!]—A Pearcy Massacre Update.”
The quotes in the title were responses I got earlier this month from people in the Garland County, Arkansas criminal justice establishment, when I asked for any information on the case.
On November 12, 2009, Edward Earl Gentry Sr., Edward “Eddie” Gentry Jr., Pam Gentry, Jeremy Gentry and Kristen Warneke were all murdered, execution-style, and all but Edward Earl Gentry Sr. were burned beyond recognition. The victims could only be identified via dental records.
The Wikicensors at Wikipedia, or as I call it, The Pretend Encylopedia, either ignored or censored all reference to my first report, “Never Heard of the Pearcy Massacre? One Guess Why Not!” (There are censors at Wikipedia who delete almost all references to my work, as well as a biographical entry someone wrote about me, and have threatened editors with bans, for citing my work.)
The reason Wikipedia, like the national MSM, ignored the case was because the victims were all white, and the suspects were all black.
After my second report, I again checked The Pretend Encylopedia, to see if the censors had finally permitted someone to take note of the victims.
No such luck.
I checked under the names of all of the victims, under “Pearcy, Arkansas,” under the name of murderer “Marvin Lamar Stringer,” and under the names of defendants “Jeremy Pickney” and “Samuel Lee Conway,” but came up with nothing. I guess the Pearcy Massacre is just a figment of my imagination.
By Nicholas Stix
August 28, 2010, 1:59 a.m.
Nicholas Stix, Uncensored
Revised at 5:35 a.m., on Saturday, August 28, 2010.
Last updated at 10:36 a.m., on Monday, February 21, 2011.
One or two mischief-makers have tampered with articles at The Pretend Encyclopedia, aka Wikipedia, regarding black racist Maurice Clemmons’ ambush massacre of four white police officers in Lakewood, Washington on November 29. (See my 2008 American Renaissance exposé, “Wikipedia on Race.”)
In the article, “Maurice Clemmons,” someone slipped in,
Prior to his alleged involvement in the shooting, Clemmons had at least five felony convictions in Arkansas and at least eight felony charges in Washington.[2]
Alleged involvement? Editors will tell you that saying “alleged” is an ethical obligation, but they act out of prudence, based on a healthy respect for the libel laws, such as they are.
If a man is falsely accused, and able to clear himself before the statute of limitations runs out for a civil suit, he can sue for defamation any media outlet that falsely accused him. That’s why, when media operations want to defame a man while protecting themselves from costly litigation, they use “anonymous sources,” often government officials who are themselves seeking to railroad the subject in question, say by poisoning the jury pool (see the Bernard Goetz and Steven Hatfill cases). But the protection of the media is so broad, due to the Supreme Court’s decision in the New York Times Co. v. Sullivan case, which said that a victim must prove “actual malice”:
Held: A State cannot under the First and Fourteenth Amendments award damages to a public official for defamatory falsehood relating to his official conduct unless he proves ‘actual malice’ - that the statement was made with knowledge of its falsity or with reckless disregard of whether it was true or false.
And the High Court made that standard almost impossible to satisfy, at least against Big Media, which can almost always get away with pleading “absence of malice.” (Although the Sullivan decision was limited to the press libeling or slandering public officials, somehow it was extended over the years, in practice, to other public figures, and then to private persons.)
But once a bad guy gets his, there’s no obligation, ethically, prudentially, or legally, to say that he “allegedly” committed a crime that a study of the facts says he did. Indeed, it would be both morally perverse and idiotic to refrain from stating the obvious.
Maurice Clemmons was identified by a coffee shop employee as the killer; identified by the weapon he left at the scene of the crime as the killer; identified by the Glock pistol that he had taken off of one of his victims, and possessed at the time that Seattle PD Officer Benjamin L. Kelly shot him dead, as the killer; identified by the blood that he left on the seat of the first getaway truck, registered to one of his businesses, as the killer; identified by his old cellmate, then-fugitive Darcus Allen, who has admitted driving Clemmons to the coffee shop, as the killer; identified by his friend, Quiana Maylea Williams (originally misidentified as his sister), who tended to his wound, and had a blood-stained carpet to show for it, as the killer; and finally, identified by the slug fired into his gut by heroic, dying Lakewood PD Officer Greg Richards, as the killer.
And in the article, “Lakewood, Washington,” either the same deceiver or an ally slipped in the second sentence in the following paragraph.
Officers killed in the line of duty
On November 29, 2009, four Lakewood Police Department officers were shot and killed. Police believe Maurice Clemmons[12] walked into the Parkland Forza Coffee shop at around 8:15 a.m. After approaching the counter, he turned and started shooting.[13] Dead at the scene were Sgt. Mark Renninger, 39, and officers Tina Griswold, 40, Ronald Owens, 37, and Greg Richards, 42. Each of them had served with the department since its inception.[14] Two baristas and several customers in the shop were not injured.[13] Clemmons was shot and killed by a Seattle police officer two days later.[15]
These are the only Lakewood Police Department officers who have died in the line of duty.[14]
“Police believe”?! Police know. As do we all.
The redefining of black criminals as only “allegedly” guilty is a black thing. Black racists increasingly refer to convicted black criminals as only “allegedly” guilty committed the crime for which they were convicted. That is because for black racists, no black can be guilty of committing a crime in Ameri-kkk-a. It’s just the white man’s allegations, and the white man’s laws, which most blacks refuse to recognize, no matter how heinous the criminal, and even when the victims are themselves black. This mentality is a pillar of what I call the paranoid, black supremacist, jailhouse philosophy of law. “Jailhouse,” because that’s where it began, only now most blacks at all levels, including the penthouse, have the mentality of a bunch of convicts.
Update: 10:36 a.m., on Monday, February 21, 2011. Both Pretend Encyclopedia entries still contain the racist mischief!
4 COMMENTS:
Anonymous said...
Any news about the proceedings against Clemmons' various helpers and his driver, Darcus Allen, who is being charged with murder? I couldn't find anything recent when I did a Google search.
I didn't see any news regarding the Pearcy Massacre in Arkansas either.
David In TN
SATURDAY, AUGUST 28, 2010 8:54:00 PM EDT
Nicholas Stix said...
The most recent update I have on the "Clemmons 7," as the killer's friends and family who have confessed to helping him are called, is from June 10.
http://o.seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/
localnews/2012083794_clemmons11m.html
I seem to recall a time when confessing to crimes precluded the need for trials, but when blacks confess to crimes today, they virtually always then plead "not guilty," and usually recant their confessions.
"Pearcy Massacre," what Pearcy Massacre? Never happened.
At the time, I checked, and although Google News typically listed not only every VDARE front-pager, but blogs and even reader letters, it refused to list my article. Google News now has a "custom range" function to go back in time. It says there has been no news about any Pearcy Massacre at all this year.
So, it's simple. There was no Pearcy Massacre.
SATURDAY, AUGUST 28, 2010 9:57:00 PM EDT
Anonymous said...
I just found some news from 2 days ago on the Lakewood Massacre. It's from the Tacoma paper, The News Tribune. Five of Clemmons helpers are supposed to go on trial next month.
All of them are pleading not guilty. The defense attorneys tried to get the cases severed, but (unlike the Knoxville Horror), they will be tried together.
David In TN
SATURDAY, AUGUST 28, 2010 10:56:00 PM EDT
Anonymous said...
Correction. The trial of Clemmons' helpers, as of now, is scheduled for October 28.
David In TN
SUNDAY, AUGUST 29, 2010 11:08:00 AM EDT
